Restorative
Tiffany Lu, DMD
Pediatric Dental Resident
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV
University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Dental Medicine
Rowland Heights, California, United States
Lee R. Roundy, Program Director, Pediatric Dentist
UNLV SDM Pediatric dental residency
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Purpose: The aim of this clinical trial was to assess how placing a sealant over the margins of a Class I composite restoration affects microleakage and surface roughness over time.
Methods: Forty extracted mandibular molars had Class I Premise packable composite restorations placed. The teeth were split into 2 groups – 20 in ClinProSealant and 20 in Fuji Triage sealant. Sealant was placed on half the restoration per tooth. Microleakage and surface roughness were measured post-restoration using the Keyence wide-area 3D measurement system. Teeth were placed in a thermocycler at 1, 3, and 5 weeks, representing clinical years. Values were measured at each interval and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test.
Results: For both ClinProSealant and Fuji Triage sealant groups, there were statistically significant increases (P < .05) in microleakage on both sides of the restorations (with and without the sealant) from post-restoration to 5 clinical years. For both groups, when comparing both sides at each time interval, the microleakage and surface roughness differences were not statistically significant (P >0.05). When comparing the effectiveness of the 2 sealant materials, there were no statistically significant differences (P >.05) in microleakage and surface roughness at all time intervals.
Conclusion: Though adding sealant over the margins of a composite restoration can fill in microcracks, this study shows there are no significant differences in microleakage and surface roughness compared to just doing a composite restoration by itself. Further research can be performed with a larger sample size to test for possible significant differences.
Identify Supporting Agency and Grant Number: