Skip to main content
2025 AAPD Annual Meeting Main banner
Cheng Crowns
Information & Legend
This session is not in your schedule.
This session is in your schedule. Click again to remove it.
Presentation Icons
Ticket Required
Ticket Required
Sold Out
Sold Out
Recorded Session
Recorded Session
Rate ePoster

Oral Pathology

286 - Prevalence of Pre-eruptive Intracoronal Resorption: A Systematic Review

Saturday, May 24, 2025
11:45 AM - 12:00 PM MDT
Has Audio

    Presenting Author(s)

  • Frankie Chyi, DDS

    Pediatric Dental Resident
    Hennepin Healthcare
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

    • Research Mentor(s)

  • TM

    Tamer Marzouk, BDS

    Hennepin Healthcare
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

    • Program Director(s)

  • EF

    Elisabeth Fulling, DDS

    Staff Pediatric Dentist
    Hennepin Healthcare
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Abstract:



Purpose:  The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the prevalence of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption (PEIR) in the primary and/or permanent dentitions.

 

Methods: A literature search of indexed databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) was conducted without language or age restrictions up to and including January 1, 2025. Cross-referencing was used to further identify articles. The eligibility criteria were observational studies with original data that evaluated the prevalence of PIER in the primary and/or permanent dentitions.

 



Results: The literature search generated 174 records and 20 full-text articles were reviewed. Fourteen studies comprising 57,205 individuals from 10 countries (Australia, China, Hungary, India, Israel, Jordan, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and Turkey) fulfilled our selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. The prevalence of PEIR on panoramic radiographs ranged from 1 to 27% (mean 5%) per individual and from 0 to 2% (mean 1%) per tooth. The prevalence of PEIR on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) ranged from 10 to 15% (mean 12%) per individual and from 2 to 4% (mean 3%) per tooth.

 


Conclusion:

The available evidence indicates that PEIR is not uncommon and CBCT is better at diagnosing PEIR compared to panoramic radiograph. 

Identify Supporting Agency and Grant Number: